When does taking naked pictues of a child become porn? - pictues of vaginia
I'm sure his parents took pictures of naked, when he was born, because they thought it was cute. Is Pornography? Is it different from say, pictures of naked 3 years old or 8 years? If a child porn pictures appear in a memory instead of a photo album?
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Pictues Of Vaginia When Does Taking Naked Pictues Of A Child Become Porn?
17 comments:
today must be very careful. My rule is not to photograph genitalia. Photos Back Baby is doing well, and if you do not have a T-shirt is also good. but no pictures, because sex can be considered pornographic. and not be increased so that most would consider a sexual pose. and if you are older than 4 years, I would say that all nudes.
I can understand, taking photos of a baby, even a child, but not when they are older than two years should not be an excuse to take pictures of them naked, ever.
If the child pornography, if you present suggestive. Moreover, there is a difference between taking a picture of his three years covered in bubbles in a tub and take a photo of his eight years old, naked in the bathtub. I would say there is a certain age, where children too modest and do not want to make nude photos. Normal parents understand, respect, and that.
If a person other than a parent and / or is insufficient, a pose!
Es ist wirklich ein nicht vorhandenes Problem. Ich meine, wie viele nude Fotos, die Sie wirklich brauchen, um ihr Kind trotzdem haben? What's happening?
I receive photos of my children, the first bath and show his stuff after that I will no longer just for that reason, and when my son 18, the image of themselves
go wrong and then I blackmailed with new friends ... hehehhe j / k
I think there is between the ages of 2 or 3 and should be approached with great taste.
I think the question refers to the idea behind the photo is taken. I take a picture of my son in the bathtub, because I think it's cute, but if you comply with dirty thoughts when he is wrong.
-Jess
It is intended first and foremost. If you have a photo of her son, because he / she is naked and his sexual desire you, it's porn. If you brought a picture of a naked boy in a sexual position, it's pornography. If you have a photo of a child in mud from head to toe covering, because it * cute * not porn.
I really do not know, but it is sad to see that the heads of people ill
If you pictures of their children for one reason sex porno. a picture of my baby because it is always
I would say 5 years and older, the old photos of acts are. do not want this to introduce them bc if someone tries to feel something of the natural. 8, the old one. wouldnt be called for the situation, Porno, but the old defenatly
if they taste and sell the pictures for money or for others to enjoy themselves by watching
if she was naked, because she will not do so if, as they came into the mud and porches from head to toe, play, or do you know what I mean
to say more or less, if your clothes and take pictures
legally separated from b-1 days, it is considered child pornography.
I do not think the image of a child under eight years (can be viewed at least), if pornography is the intention of the person to be the photo. The fact that some may associate Jack Off to pornography does not. Some people masturbate May, a picture of Bob Dole as a speech, not that Bob Dole to make porn?
How to be sure, I think three is the limit when the old man. Mainly because people so overprotective of the children, no matter how much you lose a parent, a risk to their children and just go to jail for taking photos.
I also have pictures of my naked as a child, but it depends on who took the photos and then in his possession;
Post a Comment